Uncopyright

The following is a rehashing of Leo Babautas “Uncopyright” declaration from his own blog, Zen Habits. The following is also true for my writing. I didn’t have to give him credit, but he most certainly deserves it. His writing is very inspirational.

I release my copyright on this content. I’m granting full permission to use any of my content on Armchair Activist in any way you like.

There is no need to email me for permission. Use it however you want! Email it, share it, reprint it with or without credit. Change it around, put in a bunch of swear words and attribute them to me. It’s OK. 🙂

Credit and payment
While you are under no obligation to do so, I would appreciate it if you give me credit for any work of mine that you use, and ideally, link back to the original. You don’t have to pay me, but I will never turn down money (except for invasive advertisement.)

Why I’m releasing copyright
I’m not a big fan of copyright laws anyway, especially as they’re being applied these days by corporations, used to crack down on the little guys so they can continue their large profits.

Copyrights are often touted as protecting the artist, but in most cases the artist gets very little while the corporations make most of the money. I’m trying this experiment to see whether releasing copyright really hurts the creator of the content.

I think, in most cases, the protectionism that is touted by “anti-piracy” campaigns and lawsuits and lobbying actually hurts the artist. Limiting distribution to protect profits isn’t a good thing.

The lack of copyright, and blatant copying by other artists and even businesses, never hurt Leonardo da Vinci when it comes to images such as the Mona Lisa, the Last Supper, or the Vitruvian Man. It’s never hurt Shakespeare. I doubt that it’s ever really hurt any artist (although I might just be ignorant here).

And while I’m no da Vinci or Shakespeare, I can’t help but wonder whether copyright hurts me or helps me. If someone feels like sharing my content on their blog, or in any other form for that matter, that seems like a good thing for me. My work is being spread to many more people than I could do myself. That’s a plus, as I see it.

And if someone wants to take my work and improve upon it, as artists have been doing for centuries, I think that’s a wonderful thing. If they can take my favorite posts and make something funny or inspiring or thought-provoking or even sad … I say more power to them. The creative community only benefits from derivations and inspirations.

This isn’t a new concept, of course, and I’m freely ripping ideas off here. Which is kinda the point.

Counter arguments and all that
There are a number of objects that will likely be brought up to this idea, and while I can’t possibly answer all of them, here are a few of my responses in anticipation:

1. Google rank will go down. My understanding is that Google penalizes pages that have exact duplicates on other sites, when it comes to PageRank. I don’t know how much of a penalty that is. If people duplicate my content (which they already are, even without permission), it’s possible that my PageRank will drop and people will have a harder time finding my content on Google search. If that’s the case, I accept that penalty. I’ve never been one to go for SEO techniques anyway, so this is nothing new to me.

2. Who knows what people will do with your work? Someone could take my work, turn it into a piece of … baloney … and put my name on it. They could translate it with all kinds of errors. They could … well, they could do just about anything. But that kind of thinking stems from a mind that wants to control content … while I am of the opinion that you can’t control it, and even if you can, it’s not a good thing. What if someone takes my work and turns it into something brilliant, and becomes the next James Joyce? Or more likely, what if they take the work and extend the concepts and make it even more useful, to even more people? Release control, and see what happens. People are wonderful, creative creatures. Let’s see what they can do.

3. You’re making other bloggers look bad. Perhaps, if you want to see things in a negative light. But I’m not doing this as a challenge to other bloggers, or as a comment on their policies. I’m doing it simply to stay in line with my values. And who knows? Maybe others will be inspired by this in some way. Or maybe they won’t. Either way, please don’t judge others based on what I do.

4. What about if you write a print book? If/when I get published by a major publisher, I probably won’t be able to release copyright. I accept that as a cost of getting published in print. If I contradict myself, very well … I contradict myself. [Edit: I should have attributed this before, but the last sentence is a paraphrase of Whitman.]

5. What if someone publishes a book with all your content and makes a million dollars off it? I hope they at least give me credit. And my deepest desire is that they give some of that money to a good cause or… well… me. I’m not going to hold it against them if they don’t though. 

6. But … but … they’re stealing from you! You can’t steal what is given freely. I call this sharing, not piracy.

4 Responses to Uncopyright

  1. homelessgirl says:

    Awesomely said.

    I’m going to add a similar page on my blog, sorry to have to copy your idea

  2. Jeremy Keith Hammond says:

    Oh no – that’s the idea! Use as much as you want 😀

  3. Andrew says:

    And I call it bad economics and a lame idea that works for bloggers but not the real world.

    Thank you Leo for creating an army of copycats who haven’t actually thought about the whole idea, but who nonetheless insist on claiming that copyright is this terrible, horrible thing.

    Leo ought to stick to writing about writing, honestly, because he doesn’t know what he’s talking about – nor do the legions of people who follow in his every footstep. THINK FOR YOURSELF people. *facepalm*

    There are VERY good reasons why copyrights exist.

  4. Jeremy Keith Hammond says:

    Welcome to my blog, Andrew. I think we could have a very interesting and friendly debate here – I invite you to challenge my writing… in a respectful manner.

    As the first person to make a negative comment on my blog I’d like to take this opportunity to offer some advice – or rather a rule of thumb:

    Please – if you disagree with something here – offer some constructive comments and refrain from unsupported, ad hominem attacks. More specifically for you, Andrew – try providing examples of the “VERY good reasons why copyright exists.” I’ll be the first person to agree with you about them.

    I encourage lively debate and a diversity of opinions – but I do not tolerate inciting trolls.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: